Portland Timbers Players Ratings: DC united away edition
It is that time again for the player ratings based on a 1 to 10 scale. 1 being bad and 10 being epic.
- Rodney Wallace - 5 - Really thought he started out really well but faded as the game went on
- Futty Danso - 7 - Without him and Brunner the Timbers would have lost
- Eric Brunner - 6 - Got turned way too easily on the goal but saved another one
- Eric Alexander - 6 - I really thought he relieved a ton of pressure and got out of tight spots, once he was taken off it was back to the kick and chase
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Disagree with Brunner
No way to defend DeRo’s goal any better than he did. I’d put him at 7 with Futty. Was disappointed with chara. He doesn’t share space well with Jack. When we played the flat MF they were both ineffective once we started playing more diamond Chara exploded. With both Jack and Chara ahead of Marcelin he looked lost. Communication?
I would swap Brunner and Futty
Futty was a boss in the air and made some good tackles, but gave up on plays late in the game and had, as he always does, a number of really bad clearances. Both of those issues lead to scoring chances for DC and it was only by the grace of Perkins and Brunner that they were cleaned up.
Contributing Editor for Stumptown Footy
by William Conwell on Oct 20, 2011 8:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Alhassan
I wonder if there are any stats for % of shots that off goal in a season. Amazing how many times he has miss-hit a shot this season. I know he is young, but he really faded from value the last 3rd of the season. Curious if we give our wings another year, so look elsewhere. Last night was another disappointment.
Spencer at 5 not 7
Not sure I would rate Spencer’s game as highly. Obviously he was dealing with a limited roster, but all season I feel like we should have been making our subs around minute 60. When players get tired, and start slowing down we have to sub. Too many times we’ve proven that we’ll give up late goals. You have to see that coming at this point and do something to address it, but I haven’t seen any change to try and deal with the problem.
Also I would have liked to see Dike in earlier. Yeah, he was a little wild but he brought energy when we needed it, and I am curious to see what might have happened if he had a little more time to settle into a playing rhythm.
2 points
1) Our first sub was in the 63rd minute, Umony on for Alexander.
2) With a lead Cooper is a better player at killing the game off than Dike will ever be and therefore Cooper stays. Of course once the goal was given up Dike came in around the 84th minute.
Contributing editor to Stumptown Footy the Portland Timbers SBN blog.
I didn't have a problem with his subbing
but i would have rated him lower based on the idea I don’t believe in donig a bunch of new stuff in a must win game, after you have been playing fairly well. If you take out that houston game we had a pretty good run of games, yet he decides to go to a formation we haven’t done for months. Just seems like odd timing to me. At this point of the season we should be in our top form and also have a good feel for how we play. We shouldn’t be switching up the line up the formation in the 2nd to last game of the season when we have to win.
He selected a weird bench...
… for playing a 4-5-1. He had 3 defenders and 3 forwards on the bench. (Yes, Umony came in at mid, but he’s a de facto forward.)
I would’ve had Lowry on there at least for fresh legs or if Chara, Jack, or Marcelin get hurt. (The first 2 could’ve easily been subbed out at 70’+)

by 

















