Portland Timbers Roster Analysis: Defenders
By now we all know the story pretty well: the defense was crap at the beginning of the season, but by the end it was one of the Portland Timbers' strengths. Individual players improved, as did communication amongst them, and the front office augmented that development with a shrewd mid-season trade.
Even considering the improvements made during the course of the season, though, it is clear that Gavin Wilkinson and company will not shy away from making further improvements.
Defensive Wings
Mike Chabala and Lovel Palmer, players brought in from the Houston Dynamo to shore up the wings, were likely thought of as temporary solutions, solid though they both were. They both played stingy defense had some nifty plays on the attack. They weren't perfect, but they got the job done.
But the drop-off in quality after those two is significant. Rodney Wallace has shown himself to be shaky defensively, at least at this point in his career, and may well move to a midfield role in the future. Chris Taylor stayed confined to the reserve squad for the duration of the season. Steve Purdy is a decent replacement on the right wing (as well as in the center), but at 6'4" he is more naturally suited as a central defender.Central Defense
The Timbers organization signaled their trust in the three central defenders who have logged the most minutes, protecting Eric Brunner, Futty Danso and David Horst during the expansion draft. The trust is well placed. Brunner has become the leader the Timbers needed in the defense, holding the back line while Horst and Futty intercept opposing attackers and occasionally play the ball forward.
In the short term the Timbers might be all right with four players (including Purdy) vying for the two center defender positions. But the team does not have any young talent in development -- the reserve side was often forced to rely on guest players to cover the back line in 2011.
Goalkeepers
The first and second string goal keepers are set in the minds of Timbers fans, in Troy Perkins and Jake Gleeson. Adin Brown's release opens a spot for another young upstart -- or perhaps an experienced former Timber -- to stand between the sticks in case the first two get injured.
What the Timbers have:
- Size and composure in the center: Brunner, Futty, and Horst
- Experience on the wings: Chabala, Palmer
- Promising youngster on the left wing: Chris Taylor
- A serviceable utility substitute: Steve Purdy
- General awesomeness in goal: Perkins, Gleeson
What the Timbers are lacking:
- Depth on the wings, especially on the right
- One more central defender and one more goalkeeper
The most pressing concern continues to be on the wings. The Timbers front office think highly of Chris Taylor and Rodney Wallace, but neither finished the season as a starter-quality player. Jonathan Bornstein's name has been tossed around here on Stumptown Footy, as the Timbers hold his MLS contract. He would likely bring some improvement and veteran savvy to the squad, but he would also be yet another left defender on a team that already has three of them (if you include Wallace). They would still need to add depth on the right.
The Timbers will likely be looking for at least two defensive wings, one of them good enough to start ahead of Chabala and/or Palmer at least occasionally in 2012. They also need to sign a young central defender to develop over the longer term.
Finally, the front office will likely sign a third keeper (and I wouldn't be at all surprised if that third keeper was Steve Cronin).
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Need RB depth
But I think Palmer accounted for himself well, considering the circumstances. Is he the end all, be all solution there? No, not yet. But I’m fine with him at RB again if no significant upgrade is available now.
The CB trio of Brunner, Horst, and Futty can really be the foundation of the entire squad (I think defense first). Horst provides toughness and both Brunner and Futty are solid guys who are very good in the air. They’re also intelligent and have good leadership qualities.
One thing that does need improvement is the offside trap. How often did the Timbers successfully pull one off? I really don’t remember many. Instead it seemed like one-on-one defense a lot that sometimes was a fire drill.
I love Portland because everyone here takes things so seriously, sort of.
by yepyou'reright on Dec 1, 2011 11:31 AM PST via iPhone app reply actions
Re: the offside trap
Agree with this and think that as much as Brunner’s leadership qualities are touted, this is one area where we clearly need more on the pitch leadership. A successful trap requires the coordination of your back line and that means whoever is your captain back there needs to keep the line in synch
One of the areas in which the team improved
This is by no means a scientific study, but the number of times opposing attackers got behind our defense because one guy was out of position seemed to decrease as the season went on. I remember that happening regularly at the start of the season; not so regularly toward the end.
That’s not necessarily a measure of the team’s effectiveness in executing the offside trap, though. At the very least they were trapping and not trapping in unison, but I think you’re right that it’s an area where they can improve.
Also, one big reason the Timbers didn’t pull off the offside trap with so much regularity is that Cooper and Perlaza weren’t playing for the other team. Tee hee.
When I write, I write for the Timbers. Contributing Editor of Stumptown Footy
by Andrew Wheeler on Dec 1, 2011 3:35 PM PST up reply actions
It went down cause
we no longer had Hall on defense. I liked Hall, he was cool and seemed to enjoy his time in Portland but he got lost far and out of position far too often. He always got caught on crosses and let balls in behind him
We improved as the season went on
But I think we can improve both in play and in personnel next year.
volatilelyle.com
The most amazing part of last season
Was how awful the team’s defense was to start the year. After the Chabala/Palmer trade, the team had a below average defense. It was still incomparably better than the defense that started the year. It was tough to watch the team without developing symptoms of mild psychosis (defined as building Purdy up as a quality fullback). I have no idea how the team functioned at all prior to that deal, I just know that I never have to watch a defense with Rodney Wallace and James Hall manning the wings ever again. It feels good.
I’m pretty excited about Taylor actually, but I agree that the team should pick up some more quality defenders. Preferably of starting quality, and not just depth guys. It’s tough to find players that both meet that requirement and don’t mess the cap up, but I honestly think the team needs an infusion of talent more than just depth.
Say what you want about America, thirteen bucks still gets you a hell of a lot of mice!
*Jeremy Hall
However,
First 19 games GAA: 1.68
Last 15 games GAA: 1.06
Date of trade occurred after match 19.
Jag kom, jag såg, erövrade jag.
Don't know how I messed that up
Especially since I just read an article on him.
And those numbers really don’t do it justice.
Say what you want about America, thirteen bucks still gets you a hell of a lot of mice!
All I know is I love Brunner
hes fiery, fast and was our most consistent performer all season on defense. He got beat a few times, but that will happen.
I just remember our opening match against Colorado, that game would have been far more out of hand without Brunner putting out fires all across our back line. The defense improved once Goldie was out of the rotation and Brunner no longer had to cover the others mistakes…
I do believe over the course of the season we were well served by Pekins in goal, but Gleeson was indeed awesome when he played.
"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
— Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)

by 




















