Why Portland has improved game to game
I have been really thinking about the first 5 games of the season and the steady climb of the team in terms of performance on the field. As I thought about that improvement I began to wonder why. The most obvious answer is time. Time has allowed all of our players to actually play in a meaningful game together, preseason is nice but it never has the same feel as a regular season game. As the team has played together the chemistry has really become more evident and you can see different combinations finally starting to click, such as the play between Jorge Perlaza and Kenny Cooper.
I am not so sure my next topic is main reason or a reason at all for the improvment but it sure seems interesting, at least to me.
I started looking at the line-ups from the first game until Sunday's game and found an interesting trend. The trend has to do with the number of players from the divisions lower than the MLS. Lets take a closer look at what I mean:
The line-up had only 2 Players from the lower US divisions that started and played the first half, which we all will recall was a terrible half. Those 2 players were Ryan Pore and Steve Purdy. The Second half was a different story as Portland played a much better half. The line-up that started the second half had 3 players who plied their trade in the USL. The two aforementioned players and David Horst. Kalif Alhassan did come on in the 66th minute. So in total 4 players from the lower divisions played. Was the difference betweens halves due to Colorado letting up or was it Portland having better players? I don't know but lets keep digging.
Portland Played better but still not great, sometimes they looked good but somethings still hadn't clicked. The starting line-up only included 2 players from the lower division, again it was Ryan Pore and Steve Purdy. The second half Jake Gleeson, from the Professional Development League, was called upon to man the pipes due to an injury to Adin Brown.
New England:
This is the game were it gets a little more interesting. The starting line-up had 5 players from the lower division. There were four former USL players Alhassan, James Marcelin, Purdy, Horstache and again the lone former PDL player in Gleeson. This game was by far the best game the Timbers had played to date. Was it due to the USL players or just the fact that the team had been playing together for 2 months now?
Again we see 5 players who played in the lower divisions start, the only difference from the New England game being Futty coming on in place of the injured Horstache. We also see a Eddie Johnson, who also played in the USL, come on as a substitute. No one can argue this was the best game to date for the Timbers. Once again the players who made significant contributions were a mix of former USL players and players who were already in the MLS or an equivalent league.
The same 5 players who started against the fire start against Dallas. Again the same result a win.
Some would say fielding a team with almost half of it's players, 45.5% to be exact, coming from the lower divisions would probably mean the Timbers would be losing most of their games. However when we have 5 players from the lower divisions play we are 2-0-1 with 7 points. However I really think Gleeson is the one outlier in this whole process as he wasn't placed in the starting line-up due to a drop in form from those in front of him on the depth chart. So in reality we have 4 players from the lower divisions that have really help the team to gain 7 points.
So minus Gleeson the Timbers have had 1 USL player start from the beginning, Steve Purdy. One started the first two games and get no minutes the next three, Ryan Pore. Two USL players replacing players who played on MLS teams the prior year, James Marcelin and David Horst in for Peter Lowry and Kevin Goldthwaite. They also had two players replace another USL player, Alhassan in for Pore and Futty on for the injured Horstache.
So the question is why have the USL players who have come on made such a difference? Is it because they are more hungry or want to prove something? Is it that the Portland really knows how to scout and find the players that fit in their style of play? Or is it that those players are just better than the previous players? Is it something else?
What do you think? Is having 5 USL players on the field the difference from game one to game five? Or am I just finding a nonexistent correlation?
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting theory but...
Correlation != causation.
Time and chemistry has been my logic.
"I have something 95 percent of all those All-Stars only wish they had: a World Series ring. If I had to choose between that and being an All-Star, it would be no contest. Iād grab the gold ring and never look back." -Tim Salmon
by BruinHalo on Apr 19, 2011 12:49 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
I hope he gets back into a game
I’d kind of like to see what he does, now that the team is coming together a little better. Pore looked bad those first couple games, but everyone kinda looked bad those games. I’m having a hard time isolating Pore’s play from everyone else around him.
That said, I’m not keen of screwing with a lineup that seems to be doing well.
After the team gets back from LA, we’ve got 3 home games in 7 days – Saturday, Tuesday, Friday. I wonder if that might be too many games in a short period of time, and Spencer will have to shuffle the lineup some. Might be a chance to see a few faces we haven’t seen much.
Pore is better suited in the center
I have watched him train with the team and when he plays centrally he looks much more dangerous compared to when he plays on the wings. He might be a good end of game sub to put in for Perlaza and play as a withdrawn forward to help with defense and to counter.
Contributing editor to Stumptown Footy the Portland Timbers SBN blog.
He just looked indecisive when playing on the wings
which was bad, he did not look like he lacked the skills…
"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
ā Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)
I think it's a Time thing,
Just getting used to the new system, and new players takes time. It’s been neat to see them improve.
Yeah, I think it is a time thing as well
plus benching some folks who were giving up more than they were giving so to speak.
I noticed after week 3, the week of ties in MLS, that there seemed to be a general trend. The teams with the fewest roster changes season to season tended to get the wins the first two weeks but by the 3rd most teams were playing pretty evenly, hence the spate of ties that weekend.
There were a few exceptions of course, Vancouver hammering Toronto for example, but really when you look at it, Toronto is basically a new squad out there themselves. Sure Dallas mad a ton of changes and handled the Crew pretty well, but the Crew made man many many more significant roster changes than did United.
It just shows how big a factor chemistry is in this game. If you saw the Red Bulls match this weekend you see what I mean, having the right mix of talent and players that undrstand each other makes worlds of difference. Sometimes that comes naturally, most of the time it takes time and work together.
"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
ā Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)
There's another good theory behind the lower division players
They’re used to playing with each other from last year. Same as with the concept of that over time the team has gotten better.
There’s few, if any, sports where team chemistry matters as much as it does in soccer. Keep in mind our little USL team had gone toe to toe with MLS teams last year quite a bit and put up a good fight, judging from our performances in the US Open Cup. A lot of those guys can still play.
I miss Alex Nimo :(
A few were "USL" in name only
I think it was obvious last year that players like Alhassan, Marcelin, Purdy, Futty and even Dike were brought here with the anticipation that if they played well they would have a shot at the MLS. So these were top quality guys that were maybe playing below themselves last year. I don’t think it should be a shock we have a good portion of the team starting these guys.
For me, i’m happy it went down this way. Home grown, baby! Home grown!
I miss Nimo too. :`(
~n
This is a good point.
The first couple of games there was obviously a lack of cohesion but the biggest difference between the Timbers and the other MLS teams I watched was a lack of individual displays of talent. The other teams had players who could take the ball and advance it up the field by themselves in the face of their opponents and others who could make scoring plays out of nothing. The young players that were kept from last years Timbers are immensely talented and can make a difference both as a team and on their own merits. The best example is the play of Alhassan last week where he single handedly beat almost half the other team to advance the ball. That kind of play was totally missing in the first couple of games for the Timbers. I think this and the chemistry and confidence growing between Jorge Perlaza and Kenny Cooper are the two biggest changes.
Let's look at the obvious...
Starting the season as an expansion team with 3 road games is hardly the basis for a any speculation on an “upward trend.” Most any average to above average team (which is where I think we are right now) is going to show an upward trend with how our schedule was set. In fact, it’s much more logical that simply playing at home has more consequence than the number of USL players in the game.
But, whatevs. Beat LA.
I think I'll need to tape a Timbers logo to my Beat L.A.! t-shirt
(its retro chic- from the 2000 WCF)
Blazers win!

by 


















