Portland Timbers Push for the Playoffs: How they got there
With 6 games remaining I started thinking about the season and how the Portland Timbers got to be where they are now. The more I thought about it the more I came to realize that the Timbers season could have been much much worse, say Vancouver Whitecaps like (even they are figuring things out right now). So I asked a question of my fellow writers on Stumptown:
What was the turning point in the Portland Timbers season?
Check their answers out after the jump:
Geoff:
"Really it all started at the back. Back in June and July there was a serious problem with the Timbers backline. Frankly they were just letting things slide right through them, like a hot knife through butter. I fully believe that two things happened which shored up some gaping problems:
First, as we all know, Mike Chabala and Lovel Palmer were traded to the Timbers. Both have been fantastic in the back and have definitely helped keep the right and left back more stable than they were with Rodney Wallace or Jeremy Hall/Steve Purdy. Not to say the latter players were terrible (I for one think Rodney Wallace has a future with the Timbers still) but they were inexperienced in MLS. Chabala and Lovel brought that sort of veteran experience and it's paid off in dividends.
Second, the Timbers have finally found two center backs that work very well together. I wouldn't have believed in in the beginning, but David Horst and Eric Brunner have been great together. I think as the two work together during the off season and into next year we'll see even more consistency between the two, but for now they're delivering in every way we could have hoped.
This obviously had a ripple effect for the midfield and the strikers. With the defense shored up, we saw that Diego Chara and Jack Jewsbury could focus more on the attack. Chara specifically has been much more active in the last 4-5 games and it's reaped huge rewards for the team."
Andrew:
"I think a key part of the Timbers' plan from the start of the season was Kerrea Gilbert, and not being able to get him made them rely an awful lot on a fragile plan B. Under the Gilbert plan he would have played on the wing likely opposite Rodney Wallace, but some combination of Horst/Brunner/Futty/
As it happened we had two guys who were ok and certainly replaceable and a center pairing that just needed to gel a bit. The replacement of the wings and the center backs figuring things out seemed to happen at about the same time, and here we are today.
Possibly overlooked with regard to defense is the improvement that has been made in the midfield. Also around the same time Palmer and Chabala came on, the roles of Chara and Jewsbury became more solidified.
Timbers fans were rightly concerned earlier in the year that their captain and their designated player were too similar, and that they served too similar a purpose in the lineup. Both defensively minded, they tended to be less effective carrying the ball forward to the attack. That left two less experienced wings, in addition to the defensive wings, with too much of the burden of linking up with the attack. That, in turn, left the flanks (especially the wider ones on the road) far too vulnerable to the opposition and exposed Brunner/Horst/Futty to too many dangerous crosses.
Since Chara has asserted himself as an offensive threat in the middle, the wings have been able to play a more balanced game at both ends of the pitch, and Jewsbury has been able to really concentrate on holding the defensive position in the middle of pitch. With Chara, Alhassan and Zizzo more available to challenge for the ball and intercept passes while Jewsbury, Chabala and Palmer hold their positions/marks, the crosses that have come into the goal area have been fewer and weaker, and our central defenders have had an easier time challenging for them.
But the most important thread running through all of this analysis is just plain better team play -- better communication and understanding from all the players about their expectations for themselves and each other -- and that has produced higher confidence."
Will D:
"I think a lot of the team's success has to do with getting into a rhythm and establishing some kind of rapport with each other, and since the middle of May that has seemed to slowly develop. Maybe having a modicum of consistency in the back line with Palmer and Chabala there helped establish said rapport, but I think that there has to be some pretty big-league coaching going on for such a young team to gel the way they have. Also, playing Vancouver and the Revs at home didn't hurt too much either..."
Ryan:
"I think the turning point in the season was like a watershed moment after the acquisition of Lovel Palmer and Mike Chabala. I think their biggest contribution is the fact they hold both Sal Zizzo and Kalif Alhassan accountable for their defensive assignment. If you watch during a game they are constantly yelling at the young wings to get back and D-up. Steve Purdy and Rodney Wallace were either not able to or did not hold those 2 accountable.
Once the wings were shored up a little our Center Backs no longer had to be pulled out so often to the outside. Which in turn allowed them to win the balls that came into the middle of the field. Also our Central Mids no longer had to track outside to pick up defenders and they in turn were able to actually be the outlets for the defenders. Which made our possession game better and our attack that much better."
What do you think was the turning point in the season?
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting take, Ryan
They do bring a higher level of leadership than their predecessors. Chabala certainly doesn’t have the athletic ability of Rodney Wallace, but his leadership on the left wing has more than made up for that.
Kelly McLain has an interesting analysis of Jewsbury’s role up on Timbers Insider. Worth a read, considering the questions we’re pondering here.
When I write, I write for the Timbers. Contributing Editor of Stumptown Footy
I meant to add
it goes without saying that Palmer has been a vast improvement in every way on the right side. And as Geoff mentioned, not that Jeremy Hall is a bad player, but he was having a tough enough time playing in a role he wasn’t used to and wasn’t able to assert himself as a leader.
When I write, I write for the Timbers. Contributing Editor of Stumptown Footy
by Andrew Wheeler on Sep 20, 2011 5:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Once Palmer scores a goal it will look spectacular!
But the turning point for me more recently was the swap of Chara and Jewsbury in offensive and defensive roles. Jewsbury was great for us in the first half of the season as our center fulcrum on offense. Maybe not as dynamic, but a lot of goals centered around him. But now Chara is leading the way and causing even greater fits for defenses. Jewsbury lays behind for solid support. That change made our gaping middle more dynamic and able to control the flow of getting balls quickly up on the attack rather than sending up a prayer.
Jag kom, jag såg, erövrade jag.
Agreed
I would say that the biggest contributing factor to the Timber’s change in fortunes has been moving Captain Jack from the box to box midfield position to a more defensive role.
By keeping him back not only did the Timbers shore up their defense, they also prevented Jewsbury and Chara from getting in each other’s way. While Jewsbury’s offensive input has dropped off, others on the team have been put in position to succeed and they have risen to the challenge. Additionally, as the Timbers have changed their style of play toward a speedy, counter-attacking style through the runs of Zizzo and Alhassan, the more advanced role of Chara has facilitated these breaks and, while not necessarily leading directly to goals, certainly helps make the attack more dynamic as he can play players in and help switch the field of play.
Contributing Editor for Stumptown Footy
by William Conwell on Sep 20, 2011 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Jewsbury's changed role has definitely been noticable.
You don’t read/hear too many semi-derisive “Jack Jewsbury, the Timbers’ leading goal scorer” as often anymore it seems, though he still holds that distinction I believe.
Community Manager for Stumptown Footy
by William Duke on Sep 20, 2011 11:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah,
Capt. Jack is on 7 and, after tonight, Perlaza and Cooper are both on 6.
Contributing Editor for Stumptown Footy
by William Conwell on Sep 22, 2011 12:16 AM PDT up reply actions
Clearly...
The Palmer Chabala trade. I think their demeanor and professionalism really solidified our back line. There are aspects to this that I think spread to different parts of the team. I think confidence in the back line has allowed Portland to push the midfielders forward more often, and control a greater part of the pitch – I think this part of the reason that Chara goes forward more often, too – there is more confidence for more parts of the team to move forward and know the defense is more solid behind them. And offensively, Chabala’s throw-in’s and corners are a big part of the team now. Both players come down the flanks in a more controlled fashion than Wallace or Hall, and contribute that way, as well.
The team does not look as shaky in the last third of the game as they did earlier this season and I think that is a combination of having both more skill and confidence on the pitch, and I think Palmer and Chabala are a big part of that mentality.
I will be curious to see how Nagbe does with Cooper again tomorrow. I felt like Cooper was far more involved in the last game, and having your star player a clear threat to opposing teams makes us a more dangerous team.
I would like to think it was the sunny weather
Let’s get 3 points tomorrow!
by Fanstand314 on Sep 20, 2011 11:44 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Time
I agree with everything that is being said, but I have a hard time eliminating the aspect of time together. Time for the coaches to figure out the right pairings, time for those pairings to figure out how they work best together, time for the FO to target some trades to improve us, time to get fit, time to aclimate to a new culture/city…
I have to give the FO all the credit in the world right now. They really built a team that is competitive in MLS. Hopefully this carries on into next year and we’re talking about seeding and not if we’ll make the playoffs.
So the question for tonight, does perlaza start or is he a bench player moving forward?
In my opinion hes a bench player moving forward. I have said all year but really hes not very good. Yes hes got good speed, but how many breakaways has he finished and how many has he blown? Hes not a good dribbler or passer, and can’t hold up a ball to save his life. Really all he can do is run fast. With the amount of good chances hes had this year he should be at 10 goals easy this season so far.
It's already been announced that Nagbe will start
And all indications point to Nagbe being the starter going forward.
I think Perlaza is a quality player and does a lot more than just run fast. He’s tough to take down, and he puts in a ton of effort on and off the ball. His style of attack puts the opposition defense on their heels, and that has opened up space for many of the goals we’ve had — the chances we’ve had from distance from Jewsbury, Chabala, Wallace, etc, have resulted in part from a defense paying a lot of attention Perlaza’s well timed movements on and off the ball.
But it’s true that he hasn’t been the best fit. With a guy like Zizzo on the wing, Perlaza’s runs can be a bit redundant. I think we’re likely to see Perlaza as a sub or a starter on the right wing, and I think he’ll be pretty exciting to watch there.
Also, while Nagbe definitely had a career day on Friday, it’s possible that some of his success resulted from the limited amount of scouting that had been done on his work as a striker. There’s no guarantee that his success will continue at that position. So I’m certainly glad we’ll still have Perlaza around to jump back in if we have need for him down the road.
When I write, I write for the Timbers. Contributing Editor of Stumptown Footy
by Andrew Wheeler on Sep 21, 2011 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions
I guess you see more positive out of him then I do
just a few points.
-how much faster is he than nagby really? especially with the ball at their feet?
-was perlaza ever able to trap and shield the ball and play it back to a midfielder? I honestly can’t remember him ever doing it.
-for some reason him and cooper never really clicked.
-we have speed on the wing, was perlaza any good at finishing crosses? i remember quite a few he missed.
-was he any good at breakaways? simple answer is no.
-was he a good dribbler? no.
He’s just not as good as people thought he would be. He didn’t give us any more dimensions then the through ball. And if your reasoning for why he made us better was his runs, and the fact the defense has to account for him, then you can really pu tany fast forward up there and get the same production.
Not really
Any fast forward needs to understand soccer. His work with Chara once Chara got forward was great and really did put a lot of pressure on the D.
He is as fast if not faster than Nagby, especially from a stand still. With the ball at their feet they are about the same.
The other thing we need to take into account is the better service to Nagbe’s feet as compared to the service Perlaza was given at the beginning of the year. Suffice it to say that it is a completely different team now and therefore Nagbe may have gotten the benefits of those differences.
Contributing editor to Stumptown Footy the Portland Timbers SBN blog.
how much of that better service comes from nagby makin ghimself more available and having a better touch though?
I think its kind of silly to assume all o fa sudden we learned how to find forwards feet. I jsut remember times where perlaza checked back but his touch was so bad he lost the ball… or he doesn’t have his head up so even when he didn’t lose the ball he didn’t find anyone else and then lost the ball. There is no way you can tell me perlaza was a good passer after all the times he has missed the open pass on counter attacks.
Hes a decent player, but i wouldn’t go so far as to think hes a starter on an MLS playoff team. but hey thats just my opinion.
Why isn't he a starter?
I also think it is kind of silly to assume all of a sudden we have learned how to find the forwards feet. However what we did do is get two outside backs that actually do find the feet of players rather than boot the ball up the field to Perlaza or Cooper and hope that they don’t lose the ball.
Also Perlaza did lose the ball a lot but then again so did Cooper, do you know why that was? Well I think it is kind of hard to have 3 or 4 players around you and hold onto the ball. Nagbe does hold the ball better than Perlaza but the dismissal of Perlaza just because he is not as good as one of the best players on our team is kind of silly.
Contributing editor to Stumptown Footy the Portland Timbers SBN blog.
I haven't been sold on perlaza all year, this isn't a new thing for me.
Hes a throughball forward, which has a very poor breakaway %. Thats just not a good combo. I never once said he doesn’t work hard, but he doesn’t get much positive out of all his hard work.
And as far as cooper goes
I was ticked off at his play earlier this year, but I do recognize hes coming around. The one thing cooper gives you that perlaza does not is size. If we are going to be a team that uses its speed on the outside, then we have to have players big enough to finish crosses in the box. That is where cooper starts to become necessary. Most his goals this year have been off crosses if i remember right. Thats something perlaza never excelled at.
Personally im fine if they wanted ot start nagbe and Dike.

by 

















